What does it say about our food system when farmed fish are organic and wild fish are not? As Brooke wrote in her email on this, "Careening toward linguistic absurdity."
posted by Zach Rodgers at 4:24 PM
11/28/2006
currently...
www.flickr.com
|
Previous Posts
- it sucks to be TASERed
- Brooke pops a gnarly while diving
- My old friend Pete Gurney's blogging about mount...
- The Online Auteurs: good story in the Times about ...
- With Aunt Carrie at the Tucson botanical gardens....
- conserving products
- Street art at 11 Spring: I walk past this every ...
- in tucson
- I took the J train this morning two stops to Bower...
- cake
|
2 Comments:
My larger thought was not that wild should be labled "organic", because who does know what's present where they choose to be. There seems to be a belief that organic confers goodness to a product. That companies who make an effort to be good should be able to use the term. Each of our ideas of goodness are not the same. For a term such as organic to have a meaning it needs to be specific. It is absurd to use it on wild caught because we have nothing to do their care before harvest. It should be a lable of contents, not a mark of virtue. -b
This post has been removed by the author.
Post a Comment
<< Home